Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shitsville"

From WORST WIKI EVER
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
Yes misname, i know that "by definition" Shitsville is a micronation in the sense of it's existence as a silly game country, but in the sense it's existence and history it should be 100% classified as a nation. It has it's own territory, culture, population, government and all boxes checked for the "nation" checklist. --[[User:Marcel|Marcel]] ([[User talk:Marcel|talk]]) 12:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
 
Yes misname, i know that "by definition" Shitsville is a micronation in the sense of it's existence as a silly game country, but in the sense it's existence and history it should be 100% classified as a nation. It has it's own territory, culture, population, government and all boxes checked for the "nation" checklist. --[[User:Marcel|Marcel]] ([[User talk:Marcel|talk]]) 12:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  +
: This is highly subjective Marcel. The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder. The point of a wiki is to have a neutral point of view that contains the least amount of bias and most direct unbiased neutral information. So I disagree with your statement. --[[User:MisleadingName|MisleadingName]] ([[User talk:MisleadingName|talk]]) 14:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  +
  +
:: "The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder." im not?? what the fuck are you talking about did you even read the article --[[User:Marcel|Marcel]] ([[User talk:Marcel|talk]]) 15:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
  +
  +
: I think a good compromise would be saying "fictional nation". - [[User:Emilydaemon|Emilydaemon]] ([[User talk:Emilydaemon|talk]]) 14:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
   
 
== Needs to be in a more neutral point of view ==
 
== Needs to be in a more neutral point of view ==

Latest revision as of 15:14, 30 January 2025

Shitsville is a nation.

Yes misname, i know that "by definition" Shitsville is a micronation in the sense of it's existence as a silly game country, but in the sense it's existence and history it should be 100% classified as a nation. It has it's own territory, culture, population, government and all boxes checked for the "nation" checklist. --Marcel (talk) 12:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

This is highly subjective Marcel. The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder. The point of a wiki is to have a neutral point of view that contains the least amount of bias and most direct unbiased neutral information. So I disagree with your statement. --MisleadingName (talk) 14:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
"The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder." im not?? what the fuck are you talking about did you even read the article --Marcel (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
I think a good compromise would be saying "fictional nation". - Emilydaemon (talk) 14:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Needs to be in a more neutral point of view

Parts of the article read as propaganda, and should be rephrased or rewritten to reflect a more neutral point of view. - Emilydaemon (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)