Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shitsville"
From WORST WIKI EVER
Jump to navigationJump to searchEmilydaemon (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Yes misname, i know that "by definition" Shitsville is a micronation in the sense of it's existence as a silly game country, but in the sense it's existence and history it should be 100% classified as a nation. It has it's own territory, culture, population, government and all boxes checked for the "nation" checklist. --[[User:Marcel|Marcel]] ([[User talk:Marcel|talk]]) 12:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
Yes misname, i know that "by definition" Shitsville is a micronation in the sense of it's existence as a silly game country, but in the sense it's existence and history it should be 100% classified as a nation. It has it's own territory, culture, population, government and all boxes checked for the "nation" checklist. --[[User:Marcel|Marcel]] ([[User talk:Marcel|talk]]) 12:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
: This is highly subjective Marcel. The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder. The point of a wiki is to have a neutral point of view that contains the least amount of bias and most direct unbiased neutral information. So I disagree with your statement. --[[User:MisleadingName|MisleadingName]] ([[User talk:MisleadingName|talk]]) 14:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
: This is highly subjective Marcel. The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder. The point of a wiki is to have a neutral point of view that contains the least amount of bias and most direct unbiased neutral information. So I disagree with your statement. --[[User:MisleadingName|MisleadingName]] ([[User talk:MisleadingName|talk]]) 14:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :: "The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder." im not?? what the fuck are you talking about did you even read the article --[[User:Marcel|Marcel]] ([[User talk:Marcel|talk]]) 15:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
: I think a good compromise would be saying "fictional nation". - [[User:Emilydaemon|Emilydaemon]] ([[User talk:Emilydaemon|talk]]) 14:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
: I think a good compromise would be saying "fictional nation". - [[User:Emilydaemon|Emilydaemon]] ([[User talk:Emilydaemon|talk]]) 14:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 30 January 2025
Shitsville is a nation.
Yes misname, i know that "by definition" Shitsville is a micronation in the sense of it's existence as a silly game country, but in the sense it's existence and history it should be 100% classified as a nation. It has it's own territory, culture, population, government and all boxes checked for the "nation" checklist. --Marcel (talk) 12:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is highly subjective Marcel. The problem is that you're biased towards Shitsville as you're the founder. The point of a wiki is to have a neutral point of view that contains the least amount of bias and most direct unbiased neutral information. So I disagree with your statement. --MisleadingName (talk) 14:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think a good compromise would be saying "fictional nation". - Emilydaemon (talk) 14:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Needs to be in a more neutral point of view
Parts of the article read as propaganda, and should be rephrased or rewritten to reflect a more neutral point of view. - Emilydaemon (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
